- Carry On Australian Daybill Movie Posters
- The Wayward Bus Australian Daybill Original or Reissue
- Camille Daybill – Original or Reissue Movie Poster
- Aub Moseley one of our great Australian Movie Poster Artists
- BUTCH CASSIDY Daybill Movie Poster Original or Reissue
- Australia Day Movie Poster Auction
- LINEN BACKING MOVIE POSTERS – Wallpaper Paste or Wheat Paste?
- Linen Backed Movie Posters – a word of Warning
- High Society Daybill Movie Poster – Original or Reissue?
- Kevin Brianton Collector Profile Richardson Studio Movie Posters
- Alfred Hitchcock Australian Movie Posters
- Queensland Gallery of Modern Art Movie Poster Presentation report
- Endless Summer Sundays Queensland Gallery of Modern Art
- Mad Max Australian Movie Posters – Original or Reissue?
- Golden Years of Television Australian Daybill TV Series Movie Posters
- Australian Movie Poster Misprints and Errors – are they more valuable?
- Australian Movie Poster Collectors Profile: Vesna Babic
- Profile of a Movie Poster Collector: Rick Bayne
- Movie Poster Exhibition in Brisbane Extended by Popular Demand!
- PROFILES OF MOVIE POSTER COLLECTORS: Matthew Kerr
- PROFILE OF A MOVIE POSTER COLLECTOR: Brian Arnold
- THE CARS THAT ATE PARIS: Original or Reissue Daybill?
- Robert Burton Printers Movie poster artists
- Robert Burton Printers – Movie Posters
- Highest Priced Australian Movie Poster
- Ask Any Girl Daybill: Original of Reissue?
- Guns of Navarone Daybill: Original or Reissue?
- Creature with the Atom Brain Daybill: Original or Reissue?
- The Early Years: 1900 – 1941
- The Wartime Daybills: 1941-1945
Guns of Navarone Daybill: Original or Reissue?
There are five different full colour versions of the Guns of Navarone Daybill. Which of the following daybills is original?
I think the jury is out on this. As is usually the case, none of the full colour daybills are dated so no help there. When you compare the art to the original and reissue US posters, the results are inconclusive.
One expert said that the film was originally released with a “Not Suitable for Children” rating so that would tend to indicate that the two greenish coloured daybills would be first release. Note that the greenish daybill without the censor details would have been used for the New Zealand release and regions.
However, the two posters are not identical with minor changes to the art. Its hard to know why the changes were made and if they are significant but, based on the rating on the poster, it seems reasonable to assume that both greenish posters were used for the original release.
However, one very knowledgeable collector believes that the yellow background daybill with the Columbia pictures logo is the original daybill. This is the only daybill that has the logo but the censor rating on the poster is marked “For General Exhibition” which suggests that it might be a later release.
A few dealers and collectors describe the yellow daybills as “reissues from the late 60s”. My opinion is that these posters should not be described as reissues unless there is hard evidence to prove the case eg pressbook information.
Note that there are a couple of additional duotone daybills that are obvious reissues (although I do see the same poster variously described as 60s, 70s or 80s release). I have not pictured the duotone releases.
Over the years, the five full colour Australian daybills have all appeared either with prominent dealers or with the major auction companies. Each version is usually described as original.
What do you think? Which daybill is original or do you feel that they all might be first release? Post a comment below.
I found an original programme for Guns of Navarone. Note the similarity to the artwork on the New Zealand greenish coloured daybill. I think the reason for the different daybills/posters was due to the change in censorship from Not Suitable for Children to For General Exhibition which (I think) happened not long after it was released.
I think it is possible that all of the daybills would have been printed for the original release but you could say that that the yellow posters would be referred to as second printing. That’s my best guess anyway.